Phone: 612-624-5551
24-hr number: 612-293-0831

Advanced Search

This is an archived story; this page is not actively maintained. Some or all of the links within or related to this story may no longer work.

For the latest University of Minnesota news, visit Discover.


James Kakalios

U physicist James Kakalios explains how the redistribution of energy helped people survive the collapse of the I-35W bridge.

Why so many survived

Physics is one reason the I-35W bridge collapse casualty count wasn't higher

By Deane Morrison

September 7, 2007

When the I-35W bridge fell on August 1, several cars rode the bridge down and came to rest on pieces of pavement in the middle of the Mississippi River. The people who emerged from their cars could count themselves lucky; they had just survived a 60-foot drop. Besides sheer luck, one reason they made it was the way the laws of physics worked in their favor, says University physics professor James Kakalios. "According to the [video] tapes, the bridge took four seconds to fall," Kakalios says. Normally, a 60-foot drop would take close to two seconds. The extra time came from the crumbling of the bridge supports. Or, as Kakalios explains it, from the redistribution of energy. Consider a bridge the size of I-35W falling freely. At rest, it would have a great deal of potential energy; as it fell, it would convert the potential energy to kinetic energy--the energy of motion. The farther it fell, the faster it would go, the more energy it would have, the greater the force needed to slow it down or stop it, and the greater the impact it would have when it finally stopped. When the I-35W bridge fell, the steel girders under the middle part resisted the fall. As they crumbled, they absorbed energy from the falling concrete bridge deck, slowing it down. The energy of the falling bridge also went into pushing a large volume of air out of the way. The energy to set the air in motion came from the kinetic energy of the plummeting structure, and overcoming this air resistance may not have been a trivial matter.

"According to the [video] tapes, the bridge took four seconds to fall," Kakalios says.

"In autos, 25 to 60 percent of the energy of gasoline is used to fight air resistance," says Kakalios. "Without air resistance, fuel economy would be much higher."

A note on kinetic energy

Because an object's kinetic energy rises in proportion to the square of its speed, doubling the speed gives the object four times as much kinetic energy. Conversely, cutting the speed by half cuts the kinetic energy down to a quarter of what it would have been. If the falling bridge was indeed slowed from 40 to 20 mph, it's easy to see how the reduction in energy available for doing damage may well have saved lives.

Thanks to all this resistance, the bridge delivered less of an impact to its load of cars and their occupants. In free fall, it would have been traveling about 40 mph when it hit the water. But based on the time it took to fall, it probably hit at about 20 mph, Kakalios says.

Physics to the rescue

The police, firefighters, medical professionals, divers, and others who helped survivors and searched for victims are examples of the "everyday heroes" who make use of modern technology. In his new freshman seminar on "The physics of everyday heroes" this fall, Kakalios, known for his popular seminar on the physics of superheroes, explains the science behind technologies that help real heroes. Topics include infrared heat-sensing to find survivors of fires, MRI scans, and possible future technologies such as "functional MRI" scans to sense a person's thoughts. "The physics that drives all these instruments is quantum mechanics, the modern theory of atoms and light," Kakalios says. It's all based on two technologies: lasers and transistor-based semiconductors, which also make cell phones, laptops, DVDs, and similar devices possible. In other words, says Kakalios, "all the technologies without which my teenage children would not find life worth living."